Kevin Fenzi provided a short explanation here. RPM in Fedora 38 honors cryptographic policies configured in Fedora and refuses to process such packages. This is caused by certain third-party RPM packages using weak security algorithms (e.g. You can remove cached packages by executing ‘dnf clean packages’. The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 7fac5991: BADĮrror: An rpm exception occurred: package not installed If you already have some affected third-party RPM packages installed (from Fedora 37 or earlier) and try to update them, you might see the following error instead:Įrror: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 1744 Policy rejects EB3E94ADBE1229CF: No binding signature at time When a repository key is rejected, it can look like this: error: Certificate EB3E94ADBE1229CF: Signature does not verify for google-chrome-stable_current_x86_64.rpm GNOME Software outputs an error like this: Package 86_64 does not verify: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 7fac5991: BAD When an RPM signature is rejected during installation, the DNF output can look like this: The problem can occur from two different reasons - either an RPM package signature gets rejected, or a repository key of your third-party repository gets rejected. This means you won’t be able to perform a general system update, unless you manually exclude the problematic packages (which can be done in a terminal using dnf, but can’t be done graphically e.g. If they’re a part of a bigger transaction (like a system update), the whole transaction will fail to start. Those affected packages can’t be installed/updated/removed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |